North West Mediation Solutions was founded in 2006 by Peter Whitman .
Peter’s legal administrative career commenced in the late 1960s within Courts of Quarter Session which, in 1972 became the Crown Court, acting as an High Court Associate. In 1983, he was appointed Senior Clerk to the newly formed barristers’ chambers at 14 Winckley Square in Preston, steering it through its formative years until 1991, when he became clerk to 8 King Street Chambers, remaining there until his retirement in 2005.
Although now retired Peter maintains his links with NWMS and all areas of the profession in Manchester & Lancashire. We continue in his footsteps and are proud members of the Manchester Claims Association, the Federation of Small Businesses ensures and the Manchester Chamber of Commerce.
Whilst our roots are in Manchester, our mediators are now operating nationwide.
Why choose us?
North West Mediation Solutions is a specialist mediation provider, matching highly-qualified and experienced mediators with a range of commercial clients and individuals throughout the UK.
We provide:
Experienced, professional mediators
Personal, friendly, attentive and prompt support, and of course, impartiality and confidentiality at all times;
Mediator Match – We know our mediators inside out and can help to find the right mediator for your dispute.
Flexible options – half day, full day or multi day mediations
Help to engage the other parties in the process, if you need it;
Fixed fees including the Mediator’s preparation time;
A dedicated support team;
Help preparing for the mediation, we guide you through the process and the documentation you need,
Our guide to the day's proceedings to help you prepare yourself and your clients;
CEDR, one of the founder mediation bodies, describes mediation as:
“Mediation is a flexible process conducted confidentially in which a neutral person actively assists parties in working towards a negotiated agreement of a dispute or difference, with the parties in ultimate control of the decision to settle and the terms of resolution.”
Mediation is an alternative to court proceedings which offers a binding agreed settlement facilitated by the independent mediator. The common features which distinguish mediation from public court litigation include:
privacy and confidentiality, which may help ring-fence the difficulties and preserve working and contractual relationships;
the procedural flexibility and informality, with the parties having controls over the proceedings, including the timeframe within which the matter is to be conducted – most mediators tell the parties that “it’s your day”;
control as to where the mediation will take place;
choice of the neutral independent mediator thereby taking into consideration either the expertise and experience in the substance of the dispute, or on the expertise and experience as a mediator. 80% of those who replied to a survey indicated that they would always appoint a mediator on the experience and expertise as a mediator.
Very approachable people, efficient, value for money and a first class, well-prepared, mediator who achieved an unexpected settlement.
Contentious probate partner
Our team
With more than 25 years of experience resolving disputes for clients nationwide, our team is ready to help.
Accredited as a mediator in 1994 Tim has a vast experience in mediation, including professional negligence claims, partnership/shareholder disputes, property/agricultural matters, inheritance claims and insurance/personal injury claims.
Peter is the chief executive for Gateley Vinden. He qualified as a mediator in 1999 and specialises in construction, professional negligence, engineering & banking disputes
Lindsey is the Managing Director at Peach Law based in Manchester. She is a CEDR accredited mediator and uses her expertise to act as a workplace or employment mediator.
Mark is a partner at gunnercooke LLP. He qualified as a mediator in 2000 and specialises in insolvency, professional negligence and partnership/shareholder disputes.
Victoria is the Managing Director of NWMS. She's also a partner at Gunnercooke LLP where she specialises in commercial and insolvency litigation. Victoria is a community mediator.
Jeff qualified as a Mediator with CEDR in 2000. He is the head of litigation at Brabners LLP. He specialises in property, sports, contract and professional negligence mediation.
We like to think we will always be around. Unfortunately, our inability to confront our own mortality can have a disastrous effect on those closest to us and our businesses. All businesses need to deal with succession, but farming families are particularly vulnerable to the effects of failing to deal with succession. Why is succession planning so important within farming? One of the main reasons is that children are often involved in working on the family farm and there is this unwritten understanding that one day all of this will be yours. Farming families are also notorious for not having partnership agreements in place, which again can leave the business open to potential disputes over the ownership of the business and its assets. Issues within farming One of the most common disputes that arise in farming families from a lack of succession planning is a proprietary estoppel claim – briefly put this is where: A representation, promise, assurance or other encouragement by the defendant giving rise to an expectation by the claimant that he/she would have a certain proprietary interest. There is reliance by the claimant upon that expectation. Finally, the claimant suffers a detriment in consequence of his/her reasonable reliance on the promise. When can mediation help? During the planning discussions Getting to the actual discussion about succession is often the first hurdle. Farmers are often so busy running the farm that they don’t have time to think about succession planning and for many people having this sort of discussion doesn’t come easy. Family members don’t want to rock the boat – children don’t want to disappoint their parents by admitting they don’t really fancy running the farm. Parents may feel that they are forcing their children into running the farm, but then equally children can be insensitive with their new ideas for the farm, which can often lead to disputes with their elders. Having an open and honest conversation as early as possible – and before a problem arises, is the best course of action. The children may not want to carry on the farm, but by knowing this the parents can plan for their retirement and have something to aim for. Sometimes these discussions will get out of hand. Heated debate may take place and people may get offended and upset. Mediation enables an independent third party to come in and speak with all of those involved. The mediator can: Explore the goals of each family member and what they want to achieve Facilitate conversations between family members so that they understand what others feel and want Enable the family to come up with a way forward together Where no discussions have taken place and litigation ensues Proprietary estoppel cases are fuelled with emotion and often to lead to lengthy, bitter and very expensive litigation. Whist there are practical steps you can take to avoid claims such as avoiding making promises and succession planning, this isn’t always the case. If faced with a claim for proprietary estoppel the parties should consider the use of mediation over litigation as the advantages of using mediation include: Confidentiality – farming communities are small, and these cases are ripe for local gossip and media attention. Cost – a mediation costs between £1500 - £3000 per party vs legal costs of around £100,000 if it went to trial. Speed – the mediation can be arranged within a few weeks and dealt with in one day - in comparison to the time it will take to bring the matter to trial (at least a year) and a possible 3 to 5 day hearing. The parties decide on the solution rather than a Judge making a decision (which often suits neither party).
Despite popular opinion they are not something which should be only considered in later life, or at the onset of an illness but right now to ensure your wishes will be respected should you lose mental capacity, be that temporarily or indefinitely. Lasting Powers enable you, the donor, to appoint someone you know and trust to act in your best interest, when you are unable to do so. Their purpose is to promote your independence. Most attorneys will be appointed family members – children and grandchildren. Families do not always agree on things, and this will be no exception when it comes to making decisions as an appointed attorney. What can cause issues? • Underlying family tensions o The initial appointment of the attorney(s) may have exacerbated tensions between family members, with some questioning why they were only appointed as replacement attorney for example. • Lack of consensus of agreement between attorneys • Lack of agreement between attorney(s) and other family members • Lack of agreement/consultation between attorneys, family members and medical professionals • Lack of inclusion/consultation with the donor What kind of disputes can arise? • Accommodation decisions • Financial management • Property management • Care/treatment decisions • Gifts Family disputes can increase the risk to the donor as the disputes may mean that not all decisions are being made in the donor’s best interests, which can have a negative effect on the donor’s care, health and wellbeing. The Court of Protection and the Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice encourage those involved in an attorney dispute to attempt mediation. The mediator must have regard to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (“MCA”), and one of the areas where mediation helps rebalance the power between donor and attorney(s) is that any settlement must comply with Section 4 of the MCA: “a decision made for a person who lacks capacity must be made in the best interests of that person” Mediation is ideal when people are not communicating well or not understanding each other‘s point of view. It can improve relationships and stop future disputes, so it is a good option for attorneys as it is in their interest to maintain good relationships in the future. Mediation • ensures issues are addressed in the best interests of the donor • involves the donor and takes into account their wishes and feelings • supports the donor in making decisions • enables parties to communicate effectively and understand each other’s points of view • likely cheaper than going to the Court of Protection